Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Business Model vs. Business Plan



There is a fundamental difference between a business model and business plan. A Business Model defines how you will make your product or service economically viable. A business plan describe how you are going to make your business model work. One does not always know how the plan is going to evolve, so building detailed plans although a great thought or intellectual exercise adds no real value because you are wasting time making assumption about the world out there and hope that your strategies or "plans" will address those assumptions and hypothesis. The truth could not be far from it. Most people confuse this with the product development road map and the classic example I get is people saying "hey, Steve Jobs did not go and interview his customers before he created the iPod, iPad, the Mac Air or any of the products that has come out of Apple..." to that I have only one answer, unfortunately there was only one Steve Jobs and how do we know that Steve did not do that? he had a keen eye for design and detail, he spend considerable amount of time in Silicon Valley being part of the information revolution and he had many fails to learn from. I try to remind those I am talking to that they need to spend 30 years in Silicon Valley, formed 2 or 3 multi-billion dollar companies, have the same network and experience of Steve Jobs before being able to compare themselves to what Steve Jobs did. There is a simpler way, Steve Blank, has written books, taught classesand has done many things to showcase the Customer Development Methodology, which is nothing but a Business Model. If you approach problems with the Customer Development method, you can build a pretty good hypothesis and once you have an hypothesis, it can be validated and based on the results you can build a business. The trick is to get through that cycle as fast as you can and then execute based on the learning. It is never simple and straight forward you have change your hypothesis several times and build and re-build your business model that is why it is a startup.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Isafjordur the next Startup Hub?

I saw this video on Bloomberg TV, the interesting thing is many of the new "hot" startups are cropping up in NYC because I believe there is a transition that is starting to happen, the technology is getting easier to put together the cost of creating a company is also getting to be not a huge hole in your wallet. NYC has many of the Fortune 500 companies, so if your startup is in the business of Media, Advertising, Fashion, Financial Services or even Pharmaceutical NYC is not such a bad place to be. Goes back to the Investment thesis that I wrote about, all the traditional businesses are now the users of new technology infrastructure built by Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Amazon, Apple etc.
The investment thesis is quite simple, if one looks at:
  • 1970s: Successful companies that created a lot of value were the hardware companies like Atari, Tandy, Radio Shack, Apple etc
  • 1980s: IBM PC, Microsoft, Lotus 123, WordPerfect, HP, Compaq, Apple - Software companies that built applications for the Micro and Mini computers (back then Personal Computers were called that!)
  • 1990s: Sun Microsystems, Cisco Systems, Microsoft, NeXT, Novell - Network related companies that made the plumbing of the Internet work
  • 2000s: Google, Amazon, Ebay, PayPal, Yahoo, Apple, Microsoft - Software companies that build application on top of the Internet infrastructure
  • 2008+: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Apple, Google, Amazon - Software as service companies that run on top of the software that connects the Internet.
  • 2010+: Any company that is building applications on top of the software stack of Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google, Amazon and the Mobile Devices
What is even more exciting is that the companies in the future that are building things on top of the Internet Software Infrastructure can be located anywhere and still sell it to the entire world. This creates an  awesome level playing field for places like Iceland. You can be in Isafjordur or Egilstadir and still create companies that solve a global problem. The picture is from Isafjordur, not a bad place to start the next Google. Nobody says it cannot be done!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Startup Iceland in KickStarter

So, I want to create a documentary of the journey of Startup Iceland. Who would want to see this documentary? I don't know and I don't know if I can get anyone to fund this either. I have been a big fan of KickStarter, thats when the idea broke out hey why don't I use KickStarter to fund the documentary? It is not new, it has been done before but I am sure anyone who wants to create a Startup Community would want to see this documentary. Never the less, I created the project and submitted my proposal... I am just having my fingers crossed to hear back from the KickStarter team. The documentary will basically be built around the startup community here in Iceland and the run up to the Conference that I have written to you all about, if you have not signed up yet... PLEASE DO, I promise you it would be spectacular success or an Epic failure either way you can see the journey through this documentary. I know exactly the right people to bring on board to do this. What do you think? will I get funded to get this documentary on the road?
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, February 11, 2012

Snoop-Around.com vs mbl.is

I saw this website snoop-around.com on the SVEF awards night, snoop-around.com is a Photo/Interview website in Reykjavik, where they visit creative people in their workshop or home and do a profile on them. The website won the award for being the Best Approach, Blog and Video Content category. It was really fascinating to see how creative one can get watching people doing creative work. The vicarious feeling I get being around others who are doing fantastic things is infective, it forces me to act. Anyway, I have written before about how having a balanced Creative and Analytical skill set is critical for a team to increase the odds of success. When one things about the web, it is a balance of the creative and analytical sites that get the attention. Apple is a classic example, I am writing this blog post in a Mac Air and I keep thinking how much work should have gone into the creative side compared to the engineering side of putting this piece of machine together. It is a balanced engineering and design effort that I think is amazing. I believe that is the recipe for increasing the odds of success in any endeavor.  If you are web designer focus on form and function, beauty and analytical. I believe we are embarking on a new world where Art, Creativity, Design has to in the front with all the geeky engineering and analytical discipline behind to make the thing work. The Snoop-Around.com website is a good example of that. I think their business model is built around advertisements, I don't see the advertisement on the main view of the page... it is clean, shows what I expect it to show but when you scroll down you see the advertisements done beautifully. I want to compare that to another site whose business model is built on advertisement mbl.is. I think mbl.is is a great website but the design side of it needs work, it is too messy, crowded, it actually turns me off when I go to the site. The actual content is probably 3% of the real estate and 97% of it is moving advertisements and nothing that really interests me why would I even bother going to the site? it is just poor design! What do you think?
Enhanced by Zemanta